Tell me more ×
Computational Science Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists using computers to solve scientific problems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm currently trying to compare the measurement accuracy of two devices. However, I am using one of the devices as a "gold standard" to say something about the accuracy of the other device.

The quantity I am trying to measure is the distance (depth) to a point in a scene (image). I am using a laser scanner which gives me (x,y,z) coordinates for a point and I am using optical geometry to give me (x,y,z) coordinates for the same point. My base (or reference) measurement is the laser scanner measurement. I am using this as a gold standard. I now have a corresponding measurement from the optical geometry based measurement system. I have corresponding measurements for 1000's of points. I average the error in the difference between these and get a mean error. This error, however, neglects the fact that the laser scanner too is a measurement system and has its own error. It comes with an accuracy of +/- 5mm for an object at 10m range. How do I incorporate this into an accuracy metric for the optical geometry based system?

share|improve this question
Mustafa, welcome to SciComp! I don't think this question is on-topic for us, since it does not have to do with computational science. This question sounds like it might be on topic for Physics Stack Exchange. Would you like me to migrate it there? – Geoff Oxberry Jul 4 '12 at 5:01

closed as off topic by Geoff Oxberry Jul 4 '12 at 5:01

Questions on Computational Science Stack Exchange are expected to relate to computational science within the scope defined in the FAQ. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about closed questions here.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.