# Strategies for Newton's Method when the Jacobian at the solution is singular

I'm trying to solve the following system of equations for the variables $P,x_1$ and $x_2$ (all else are constants):

$$\frac{A(1-P)}{2}-k_1x_1=0 \\ \frac{AP}{2}-k_2x_2=0 \\ \frac{(1-P)(r_1+x_1)^4}{L_1}-\frac{P(r_1+x_2)^4}{L_2}=0$$

I can see that I can turn this system of equations into a single equation of a single variable $(P)$ by solving equations 1 and 2 for $x_1$ and $x_2$ respectively and substituting them into equation 3. In doing so, I am able to use matlab's fzero command to find the solution. Using the parameters $k_1=k_2=1$, $r_1=r_2=0.2$, and $A=2$, I found the true solution to be $P=x_1=x_2=0.5$.

However, when I use newton's method applied to the original 3 variate - 3 equation system, the iterations never converge to the solution, no matter how close I begin to the true solution $x^*=(P^*,x_1^*,x_2^*)=(0.5,0.5,0.5)$.

At first, I suspected my a bug in my implementation of newton's method. After checking several times, I found no bug. Then I tried using an initial guess $x_0=x^*$, and lo & behold: the Jacobian is singular. I know that a singular jacobian can reduce the order of convergence, but I don't think it necessarily prevents convergence to the true solution.

So, my question is, Given that the jacobian of the system at the true solution is singular:

1. What other conditions are necessary to prove that newton's method will not converge to the root?

2. Would a globalization strategy (e.g. line-search) guarantee convergence despite the singular jacobian?

-

(1): This depends on the behavior of derivatives of the Jacobian (sic!) in the null space of the Jacobian at the solution. In practice, nobody calculates these derivatives, and i didn't even bother to remember the precise conditions.

(2) works, though convergence is only linear.

To get superlinear convergence (at least in the majority of cases), one may use tensor methods. See, e.g.,
https://cfwebprod.sandia.gov/cfdocs/CCIM/docs/SAND2004-1944.pdf
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2156931