Take the 2-minute tour ×
Computational Science Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists using computers to solve scientific problems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose a configuration $X\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times 2}$ is output of PCA on some high-dimensional data $Y\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times h}$. Note that this PCA is performed by $$X=Y\cdot U,$$ where columns of $U$ are eigenvectors of $Y^TY$ corresponding to its 2 dominant eigenvalues. Since $X$ is a result of PCA, then $X^TX=diag(a, b)$, for some $a, b\in\mathbb{R}$. If one now performs PCA on $X$, then the matrix $V$ containing eigenvectors of $X^TX$ would be columns of an identity matrix, and the result would be intact.

Suppose that a configuration $X$ is normalized (axes of unit length) by $\hat{X}=X\cdot diag^{-1/2}(a, b)$. If one then performs PCA on $\hat{X}$, then $\hat{X}^T\hat{X}$ would be an identity matrix. In other words, by normalizing columns of $X$ one cannot affect the PCA result except for the aspect ratio change (stretching of axes). If fact, any arbitrary stretching of axes of $X$ would have no effect since also then $\hat{X}^T\hat{X}$ would be a diagonal matrix. Am I missing something?

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.