Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 1, 2020 at 17:13 vote accept Deepak Garg
Nov 1, 2020 at 17:12 answer added Deepak Garg timeline score: 1
Oct 26, 2020 at 23:36 history edited Deepak Garg CC BY-SA 4.0
added 74 characters in body
Oct 24, 2020 at 19:29 history edited Anton Menshov CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 120 characters in body; edited tags
Oct 24, 2020 at 15:28 comment added Deepak Garg @nicoguaro I have put the question with mathematical notations now.
Oct 24, 2020 at 15:27 comment added Deepak Garg @ChennaK thank you for replying. I do not get segmentation fault. It is simply the simulation diverges as soon as I launch it. The same simulation works just fine with hexahedral elements. So surely the mistake is in the implementation of tetrahedral element. I have checked the Jacobean matrix for an element. It is positive and equal to the 6*volume. My doubt is specifically for computation of surface integral on face made by nodes 012; as the triangles 013, 123 and 230 are themselves master triangles while 012 is not. What will be the integration points and weights for the face 012?
Oct 24, 2020 at 15:19 history edited Deepak Garg CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 812 characters in body
Oct 22, 2020 at 17:22 comment added nicoguaro Some of those details can be in the form of mathematics. This site uses MathJax to render equations.
Oct 22, 2020 at 17:17 review Close votes
Oct 24, 2020 at 19:29
Oct 22, 2020 at 10:59 comment added Chenna K Please provide more details about where your simulation crashes. Is it due to negative Jacobian or segmentation fault or something else? If it is seg fault, then it is easy to fix. If it is not seg fault, then compute the Jacobian for one element. It should match the volume of the element. By the way, you don't need four quadrature points for computing the Jacobian (or stiffness matrix) for 4-noded Tet element. One is enough.
Oct 22, 2020 at 9:52 review First posts
Oct 22, 2020 at 17:22
Oct 22, 2020 at 9:51 history asked Deepak Garg CC BY-SA 4.0