Timeline for What are the basic principles behind generating a moving mesh?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scicomp.stackexchange.com/ with https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| S Jun 16, 2013 at 10:33 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 16, 2013 at 10:33 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 8, 2013 at 13:43 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More detail in the question.
|
| S Jun 8, 2013 at 9:24 | history | bounty started | boyfarrell | ||
| S Jun 8, 2013 at 9:24 | history | notice added | boyfarrell | Canonical answer required | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 9:13 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited for bounty.
|
| Jun 7, 2013 at 23:51 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2013 at 13:49 | comment | added | boyfarrell | Yes, it think is should be a pretty stable feature (the discontinuity), it may move slightly during time-sweeping and maybe become slightly asymmetric when approaching steady state. I imagine I could use a non-uniform (non-adaptive) grid with points clustered at the centre rather than something more complex. I wasn't aware of the different mesh adaptation techniques. The book seems good, although there is still quite a bit of work to implement a moving grid rigorously. I had hoped for a "quick fix"! | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 13:38 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Making the question clearer.
|
| Jun 7, 2013 at 10:39 | answer | added | Shainath | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 5:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciComp/status/342869165633310720 | ||
| Jun 7, 2013 at 2:37 | answer | added | mmirzadeh | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 2:09 | answer | added | Maxim Umansky | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 6, 2013 at 11:38 | comment | added | Daniel Shapero | From what I gather, your discontinuity is a pretty stable feature of the system in that it might move around but it's always there somewhere (correct me if I'm mistaken). For that reason, you may want to consider using a moving mesh rather than mesh refinement. It's a good bit simpler to program yourself. [This book](books.google.com/books?isbn=1441979166) is a good reference. | |
| Jun 6, 2013 at 2:20 | history | asked | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |