Timeline for How do you debug numerical code, what could be source of this oscillatory error?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 17, 2018 at 15:02 | vote | accept | boyfarrell | ||
Aug 7, 2013 at 12:46 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed link.
|
Jun 22, 2013 at 23:21 | answer | added | Wolfgang Bangerth | timeline score: 10 | |
Jun 21, 2013 at 23:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciComp/status/348214595661475841 | ||
Jun 21, 2013 at 11:00 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Included a different movie.
|
Jun 21, 2013 at 10:50 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated with solution.
|
Jun 21, 2013 at 9:01 | comment | added | boyfarrell | I tried that, it gives broadly the same. But now I feel stupid, I was testing for a sign error... setting $a=0$ and $d<0$ makes it work (in the diffusion limit, yes negative diffusion makes it work!). So for future reference, the above could be consistent with a sign error. Not completely tested yet so I will report back soon! PS. thanks for the compliment :) | |
Jun 21, 2013 at 8:54 | comment | added | Jan | I admire your conscentious approach to this problem. Are these plots from the time-dependent equations? If yes, what do you observe for $\theta = 0,0.5,1$? | |
Jun 21, 2013 at 8:08 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Error in title
|
Jun 21, 2013 at 7:39 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated links to the project page.
|
Jun 21, 2013 at 6:39 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated with more background.
|
Jun 21, 2013 at 6:23 | history | asked | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |