Timeline for Is there a standard rating system for scientific journal publications?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2012 at 7:11 | comment | added | David Ketcheson | Probably only 1-2 in any depth. But I get a lot of value out of being aware of work by reading some abstracts. I'll probably read on the order of 25 abstracts in a month. The rest are discarded after scanning the title. | |
| Jan 20, 2012 at 22:41 | comment | added | Bill Barth | I figured that there were people that kept up more than I do. I'm mostly out of the academic publishing scene (not being on that track). It's certainly easier to keep up now than when everything was paper only. Just out of curiosity, how many articles out of that collection do you end up reading in a month? | |
| Jan 16, 2012 at 20:01 | comment | added | David Ketcheson | I for one do read journal tables of contents. I use an RSS feed aggregator and it only takes a few minutes per week to keep up with about a dozen journals. I also typically get the articles well ahead of their publication date this way. You can see which ones I read here: scienceinthesands.blogspot.com/2011/10/… | |
| Jan 15, 2012 at 20:04 | history | answered | Bill Barth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |