I know that if I had evenly spaced points, I can use $U_{xx}\approx \frac{U_{i-1}-2U_{i}+U_{i+1}}{dx^2}$.

But if my gridpoints are unevenly spaced, I assume that I can obtain the finite difference formula in the following way:

$D^-[D^+(U)]$, where $D^-$ and $D^+$ are the backward and forward difference formulas. If I define $h_i=x_{i}-x_{i-1}$, then I think I would obtain:

$D^-[D^+(U)] = D^-[\frac{U_{i+1}-U_{i}}{h_{i+1}}] = \frac{\frac{U_{i+1}-U_{i}}{h_{i+1}} - \frac{U_{i}-U_{i-1}}{h_{i+1}}}{h_i}=\frac{U_{i-1}-2U_{i}+U_{i+1}}{h_ih_{i+1}}$.

However, I have some doubts about this formula. Particularly, the term $\frac{U_{i}-U_{i-1}}{h_{i+1}}$ might be wrong. Any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated :)


2 Answers 2


Since the finite difference approximation to the gradient is $$ u'(x) \approx \frac{\Delta u}{\Delta x} $$ it is clear that in your original formula, it needs to be $$ u''(x) \approx \frac{\frac{U_{i+1}-U_i}{x_{i+1}-x_{i}} -\frac{U_{i}-U_{i-1}}{x_{i}-x_{i-1}}} {\frac 12 (x_{i+1}+x_i) - \frac 12 (x_{i}+x_{i-1})} $$ which in your notation is then equal to $$ u''(x) \approx \frac{\frac{U_{i+1}-U_i}{h_{i+1}} -\frac{U_{i}-U_{i-1}}{h_{i}}} {\frac 12 (h_{i+1}+h_i)} = \frac{(U_{i+1}-U_i)h_i -(U_{i}-U_{i-1}){h_{i+1}}} {\frac 12 (h_{i+1}+h_i)h_ih_{i+1}}. $$ Conveniently, and not by accident, this reduces to the well-known formula for uniform mesh sizes.

  • $\begingroup$ That makes a lot more sense than what I was thinking! $\endgroup$
    – Paul
    Commented Apr 3, 2012 at 17:54

This paper, Generation of Finite Difference Formulas on Arbitrarily Spaced Grids, by Bengt Fornberg, provides Pseudo-Code for the... well... the title is a bit of a give-away.

If you pack it into a loop, you can create Differentiation matrices of arbitrary degrees over arbitrary point sets. If you really need it, I've got a Matlab implementation thereof that creates said matrices, which I could provide on request.


Alexander has just pointed-out fdcoeffF(k,xbar,x), an implementation of Fornberg's algorithm which computes the weights of the stencil for the kth derivative at a point xbar over a set of data at points x.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.