1
$\begingroup$

I know that in outflow boundary we assume a zero normal gradient condition and use upwind scheme for approximation. However, I saw this sentence in a book which I do not understand; "Convective fluxes are usually assumed to be independent of the coordinate normal to an outflow boundary." What does it exactly mean and why are we allowed to make that assumption?

source: link

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What book? Did the statement come with any more context? $\endgroup$ – Bill Barth Apr 1 '16 at 13:29
  • $\begingroup$ @BillBarth Thanks for the reply. It is from Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics by Joel H. Ferziger. You can see that page in the link below. [link] (books.google.de/…) $\endgroup$ – Eman Apr 1 '16 at 22:11
  • $\begingroup$ Both your assumption and the statement printed in bold are, as an aside, only true for scalar convection problems. $\endgroup$ – Wolfgang Bangerth Apr 7 '16 at 20:44
  • $\begingroup$ @WolfgangBangerth Thanks a lot for the comment. I am not sure if I quite understood what you mean. Because, for the transport of momentum, which is obviously a vector field, we can assume a zero normal gradient for streamwise velocity on the outflow surface provided that the flow is close to fully developed condition and the fluid is incompressible. My guess is, in this particular case, the streamwise component of velocity is a scalar field by itself, therefore, the assumptions above cannot be extended to vector fields. Hopefully, I got it right. $\endgroup$ – Eman Apr 8 '16 at 11:56
  • $\begingroup$ I was thinking of systems of equations, e.g., the Euler equations of gas dynamics. There, a boundary may be in- and out-flow at the same time. $\endgroup$ – Wolfgang Bangerth Apr 8 '16 at 19:01
1
$\begingroup$

I understand it as a Neumann boundary condition $\frac{\partial F}{\partial n} = 0$ where $F$ is the convective flux and $n$ is the unit normal vector at the boundary. This is the most convenient boundary condition to solve numerically the problem.

"Independent of the coordinate normal to [the boundary]" means that, in the local coordinate system of the boundary defined by the vectors $(n, t_1, t_2)$, the field $F$ may locally vary only along the tangential coordinates $(t_1, t_2)$. Hence $\frac{\partial F}{\partial n} = 0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot. It makes sense because if the normal component of gradient of convective flux is zero, it implies that the gradient of velocity, and the quantity being transported should also be zero in normal direction on the outflow surface, which is exactly the fully developed condition. $\endgroup$ – Eman Apr 6 '16 at 18:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.