1
$\begingroup$

Looking at the plain heat equation $u_t=u_{xx}$ the explicit scheme for it would look like the following iteration: $$u_{m,n+1}=\rho u_{m-1,n}+(1-2\rho)u_{m,n}+\rho u_{m+1,n}$$ I noticed this equation resembles some probability equation: basically If I look at it as: $$u_{m,n+1}=p_1 u_{m-1,n}+p_2u_{m,n}+p_3u_{m+1,n}$$ I notice $p_1+p_2+p_3=1$ and if I restrict those numbers to be between $[0,1]$ if as in case of probabilities it matches the stability criteria. Is there some sort of connection between probability and FDM here? It looks to me as $u_{m,n+1}$ is some sort of expectations but I can't make my argument complete so I would appreciate some help on that.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Well, kind of, but not like you think. First, the explicit stability criterion restricts the value of $\rho$, which doesn't enter your probability interpretation at all. But diffusion (which is described by the heat equation) has a very close connection with random walks, and both can be thought of as limits of discrete equations describing "quantized" diffusion and random walks, respectively. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 1, 2016 at 17:49
  • $\begingroup$ Your comments on connections to probability remind me of making estimates based on a Markov Process model. One might be able to view any deterministic dynamics as a Markov Process where you have perfect knowledge of the transition that will take place given some prior state. $\endgroup$
    – spektr
    Commented Jul 1, 2016 at 17:52

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.