2
$\begingroup$

I have two finite sets of events $\{x_1, ..., x_N\}$ and $\{y_1, ..., y_N\}$ that are sampled from the PDFs $f(x)$ and $g(x)$, respectively, where $x \in [-1,+1]$. I want to estimate the Legendre expansion of $r(x) = f(x)/g(x)$ using these events. What is the best method? (Note that $g(x)\neq0$ over $[-1,1]$)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your use of $x$ to refer to events is confusing here. Do you mean that you have sampled values $f(x_i)$ and $g(x_i)$ for $i\in{1,\ldots,N}$, and would like an expansion for the function $f(x)/g(x)$ using the Legendre polynomial basis in the $x\in[-1,+1]$ interval? $\endgroup$ – Richard Zhang Jun 2 '17 at 18:07
1
$\begingroup$

I believe you are asking how to compute

$$\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\approx\sum_{n=0}^p a_n P_n(x).$$

You could interpolate your samples of $f$ and $g$ to a uniform grid on $[-1,1]$, calculate the ratios at each of these points, and then use the trapezoid rule to calculate the integral

$$\int_{-1}^1 P_n(x) \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} dx \approx \sum_j w_j P_n(x_j)\frac{f(x_j)}{g(x_j)},$$

where $\{w_j,x_j\}$ represents the quadrature weights and abscissae, respectively. Given that I don't know what the functions $f,g$ behave like, I can't say much for the accuracy of this approach beyond that it should be OK if $f/g$ is smooth.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I think this should work for my case. The functions $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are not extremely smooth, although $f(x)/g(x)$ is. I guess as long as the interpolated versions of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are both wrong by approximately the same factor (which sounds plausible) this should cancel in the ratio $\endgroup$ – Sam Jun 6 '17 at 14:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.