1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the nodal and modal basis formulation from the book of Hesthaven (Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods, Hesthaven, Jan S., Warburton, Tim). For $N=2$, I get the Vandermonde Matrix, which is computed by the Jacobi polynomial for $\alpha, \beta =0$ which is the Legendre polynomial:

V = Vandermonde1D(2, x)

V =

0.7071   -1.2247    1.5811
0.7071         0   -0.7906
0.7071    1.2247    1.5811

and x = (-1,0,1) the LGL points.

In the book on page 48, it says that for $N=6$ the d) option on the table is for orthonormal basis with Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto points.

Now, if I run a code from here

[x,w,P]=lglnodes(2)

I get

x =
-1
 0
 1

which are the LGL points and

w =
0.3333
1.3333
0.3333

the weights. But then I get

P =
1.0000   -1.0000    1.0000
1.0000   -0.0000   -0.5000
1.0000    1.0000    1.0000

In the comments for the program, it says

Computes the Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto nodes, weights, and the LGL Vandermonde matrix. The LGL nodes are the zeros of $(1-x^2)P'_N(x)$

But this is different than the Vandermonde I get from the original program of Hesthaven.

Now, I kinda understand what this $P$ Matrix is. If you have the Legendre Polynomials

$p_{0}(x) = 1, p_{1}(x) = x, p_{2}(x) = \frac{1}{2}(3x^{2} -1)$.

and replace the LGL points (-1,0,1) I get this $P$ matrix. But how to get the Vandermonde matrix?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ What is the "book of Hesthaven"? Do you have a full bibliographic reference? $\endgroup$
    – nicoguaro
    Jun 13, 2017 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods, Hesthaven, Jan S., Warburton, Tim springer.com/gp/book/9780387720654 $\endgroup$
    – Geo
    Jun 13, 2017 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ You can add it as a part of your question $\endgroup$
    – nicoguaro
    Jun 13, 2017 at 22:53
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't the difference just the constant gamma that Westhaven and Warburton include that the Matlab code doesn't? $\endgroup$ Jun 14, 2017 at 14:28
  • $\begingroup$ you mean on the JacobiP file for the Jacobi Polynomial? can you be more specific? $\endgroup$
    – Geo
    Jun 14, 2017 at 18:33

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

You're using the orthonormalized version of the Legendre polynomials, while Hesthaven is not. The polynomials in your matrix are normalized by a factor of $\sqrt{\frac{2n+1}{2}}$, i.e. $\sqrt{\frac{2(1)+1}{2}}=1.2247$ and $\sqrt{\frac{2(2)+1}{2}}=1.5811$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

You need to use the "normalized" Legendre Polynomials instead of Legendre Polynomials. Where you divide the Legendre polynomial by $\sqrt{\frac{2}{2n+1}}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.