2
$\begingroup$

For spatial accuracy in 2-D Laplace equation, a 9-point stencil is better than a 5-point one.

$$\partial_tq= r\left(\partial^2_x q + \partial^2_y q\right)$$

for FTCS (forward-time, central-space) scheme to converge for 5 point stencil, $r/2\ge \delta t/ \delta x^2$

What would be the condition for 9 point stencil?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

There are actually a few different 9 point stencils in use, but they can all be written as a linear combination of the standard and skewed 5 point stencils. Performing the usual von Neumann analysis for a general Fourier mode, $e^{ikx+ily}$, produces an equation like $$a_{n+1} = a_n \left(1-\lambda+\frac{\alpha\lambda}{2}\left[\cos\theta_1+\cos\theta_2\right]+\lambda\frac{1-\alpha}{2}\left[\cos(\theta_1+\theta_2)+\cos(\theta_1-\theta_2)\right]\right)$$ where $\lambda=\frac{r\Delta t}{\Delta x^2}$. Hence the stability criterion is still $\lambda\leq \frac{1}{2}$, with the derivation and proof left as an exercise to the reader. This shouldn't be too much of a surprise, since for the "worst case" of a plane wave aligned with the coordinate system, both the 5 point and 9 point stencils collapse back down to the 1D case.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.