I need to use a Discrete-time Algebraic Riccati Equation (DARE) solver for an embedded controller (with limited processing power) in a research project and sadly, I can't find any implementation of it in C++ that I can understand. I use C++ since it is faster than higher level languages. I found various libraries online that offer Riccati equation or LQR solvers such as the Control Toolbox (https://adrlab.bitbucket.io/ct/v2.3/ct_doc/doc/html/index.html) or Drake (https://drake.mit.edu/) but I can't understand the language and I think they are full of unnecessary functions and things for the simple job of solving DARE. I would like the implementation to use basic open source C++ libraries or header files such as Eigen, Armadillo etc. with a lot of documentation, tutorials, or an active online community using them so that I can learn the syntax on my own. I'm looking for a simple code like Arash's C++ implementation of the Continuous-time Algebraic Riccati Equation (CARE) solver: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/679989/analytic-solution-to-structured-algebraic-riccati-equation .

To anyone who can help me, I would like to cite you in the bibliography so you can please include a "How to Cite" section. If you don't have a personal C++ code, can you please refer me to a library or something that can help me implement DARE in C++? I attempted to write my own solver but when I read papers of the Riccati solver, I was dumbfounded by the math and terminologies since I am an undergraduate engineering student with only basic knowledge in linear algebra. I'm not sure if this is the right site to ask but I can't find anything else so please help me out.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have you tried implementing the algorithm at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_Riccati_equation#Solution yourself? $\endgroup$ – Kirill Dec 22 '18 at 14:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Kirill, I have not since I thought that the options of implementing it and the theory are complicated. Should I implement the algorithm myself at this point? Can you recommend a reference for a fast DARE solver algorithm that is easy to understand by an amateur in Math like me? Should I implement the one written in Wikipedia? I've read that "State-of-the-art implementations of ARE solvers use a Schur decomposition method. This is what MATLAB is using (SciPy, Octave, and LAPACK also it)." <github.com/RobotLocomotion/drake/issues/1180> Is this true? $\endgroup$ – John Smith Dec 23 '18 at 6:08
  • $\begingroup$ Also, the solution in Wikipedia is for CARE not DARE. $\endgroup$ – John Smith Dec 23 '18 at 6:18
  • $\begingroup$ DARE is at the bottom of the Wikipedia section. It depends on what you need, if you’re stuck with your constraints then a simple algorithm that works for you may well be good enough. $\endgroup$ – Kirill Dec 23 '18 at 12:31

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.