2
$\begingroup$

I am using the XMDS library for solving the stochastic (projected) Gross-Pitaevskii equation

$$i \hbar \partial \Phi\left(\mathbf{r},t\right)_t=\hat{\mathcal{P}}\left\{(1-i \gamma)\left(\hat{H}_{\mathrm{GP}}-\mu\right) \Phi+\eta\left(\mathbf{r},t\right)\right\}$$

where $\eta\left(\mathbf{r},t\right)$ is a stochastic noise field.

In the XMDS documentation, it is noted that:

As all Runge-Kutta solutions have equal order of convergence for stochastic equations, if the step-size is limited by the stochastic term then the step-size estimation is entirely unreliable. Adaptive Runge-Kutta algorithms are therefore not appropriate for stochastic equations. (http://www.xmds.org/reference_elements.html?highlight=adaptive)

I have noted the arguments set out in this SE answer: Easily understandable argument that normal Runge–Kutta methods cannot be generalised to SDEs?.

From the XMDS documentation, they note that if the step-size $\Delta x$ is limited by $\eta$ then adaptive Runge-Kutta is unreliable. I am unsure what "limited" means in this sense... my step size is (I believe!) independent of the stochastic noise $\eta$ and is instead dependent on some circular momentum cut-off in spectral space.

Furthermore, work by A. Das et al. (Scientific Reports 2, Article number: 352 (2012)) explicitly uses adaptive Runge-Kutta methods for solving this stochastic PDE, but they do not explain why this is valid.

Why is it possible to use adaptive Runge-Kutta in this case?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

It turns out that adaptive step-size methods are appropriate for this equation given it is a Langevin equation in the limit of weak, additive noise. [1]

It should be noted (if anyone were to stumble upon this post), that stochastic differential equations with strong multiplicative noise are typically unstable and not appropriate for adaptive step-size methods.

[1] See G. N. Milstein and M. V. Tretyakov's general discussion of SDEs in Stochastic Numerics for Mathematical Physics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 211-283, (2004).

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.