In Bathe's Finite Element Procedures 2014 P346, the Jacobian is defined as follows: \begin{equation} \mathbf{J} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial r} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial r} \\ \frac{\partial x}{\partial s} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial s} \end{bmatrix} \end{equation}
I need to calculate the following components: \begin{equation} \frac{\partial r}{\partial x}, \quad \frac{\partial r}{\partial y}, \quad \frac{\partial s}{\partial x}, \quad \frac{\partial s}{\partial y} \end{equation}
So I figured I would try to use the Jacobian inverse to get these values as follows: \begin{equation} \mathbf{J}^T \, {\mathbf{J}^T}^{-1} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial r} & \frac{\partial x}{\partial s} \\ \frac{\partial y}{\partial r} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial s} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial r}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial r}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial s}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial s}{\partial y} \end{bmatrix} = \mathbf{I} \end{equation}
However, as I understand, the order of matrices multiplication is not important in this particular case. So if I tried to reverse the order of the matrices multiplication and do the math, this wouldn't work! As in: \begin{equation} {\mathbf{J}^T}^{-1} \, \mathbf{J}^T \neq \mathbf{I} \end{equation}
I am not sure what I did wrong here!
PS: The same applies for this document I found online on slide 4. Although the Jacobian is defined differently, they follow the same procedure. However, if you reverse the order of matrices multiplication it's no longer the unity matrix!