7
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to solve the transient behaviour of a compressible flow through a porous medium (porosity is $\epsilon$) where the fraction of B in A ($ \phi$) changes with time. The equations that I found are the following:

  • continuity: $\frac{\partial \rho} {\partial t}+\frac{1}{\epsilon}\frac{\partial \rho u} {\partial x}=0 $
  • fraction of component B $\frac{\partial \rho \phi} {\partial t}+\frac{1}{\epsilon}\frac{\partial \rho u \phi} {\partial x}=0 $
  • equation of state: $P = \rho \cdot R \cdot T \cdot Z(P,\phi)$
  • Darcy: $u = -\frac{k}{\mu} \frac{\partial P} {\partial x}$

The imposed boundary conditions are: $\phi=\phi(t) $, $P(x=L)=P_{back}$ and

$P(x=0)=P_{inlet}$ or $u(x=0)=u_{inlet}$

How should I proceed with this problem using a finite differences approach? Filling the third equation in the fourth yields an expression of $u$ as function of $\rho$ which can be used in the first two equations. So one would get:

  • continuity: $\frac{\partial \rho} {\partial t}+K\frac{\partial \rho \frac{\partial \rho \cdot Z} {\partial x}} {\partial x}=0 $
  • fraction of component B: $\frac{\partial \rho \phi} {\partial t}+K\frac{\partial \rho \phi \frac{\partial \rho \cdot Z}{\partial x}} {\partial x}=0 $

Is this a good way in solving the problem? I would proceed with using a discretization scheme for the spatial derivative and using Runge-Kutta to find the time derivative. Then I would get $\rho$ and $\rho \cdot \phi$. But can I do this, because $\rho = f(\phi)$ so there is also a coupling.

A last question is, how should I impose the boundary condition for $u$? Because $u$ is not in these last two equations anymore.

Thanks

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Use $\partial \rho \phi = \rho \partial \phi + \phi \partial \rho$ in the equation for the component fraction, then apply the continuity equation to obtain \begin{equation} \rho \frac{\partial \phi} {\partial t} + \frac1\epsilon \rho u \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} = 0. \end{equation} Assuming $\rho > 0$ in the whole domain, it can be canceled in this equation. Substitute $u$ with Darcy's equation as before and solve this equation for $\phi$ using the approach you suggested and then use $\rho = f(\phi)$ to get $\rho$. Alternatively, if $f$ can be inverted, you might as well solve the original continuity equation for $\rho$ and get $\phi$ as $\phi = f^{-1}(\rho)$.

As for the boundary condition for $u$, substitute the equation of state and Darcy's equation into $u(0) = u_{inlet}$ and discretize the spatial derivative. Though I'm not sure if the boundary conditions described in your question are consistent with the problem you're trying to solve.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.