New answers tagged

0

Its not the summation that is wrong, but the lack of indices inside it. Below this expression on their site they define: $$\epsilon(\mathbf{u})=\frac{1}{2}([\nabla\mathbf{u}]+[\nabla\mathbf{u}]^{\mathrm{T}})$$ So $\epsilon(\mathbf{u})$ is a matrix formed from the symmetrized gradient of $\mathbf{u}$. But to get the sum from the earlier expression, we want to ...


Top 50 recent answers are included