Timeline for FEM for a nonlinear parabolic PDE
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2014 at 8:00 | answer | added | Wolfgang Bangerth | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 17, 2014 at 11:30 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciComp/status/545179331962871808 | ||
| Dec 17, 2014 at 8:33 | answer | added | Jan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 17, 2014 at 8:19 | history | edited | mstrkrft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Dec 17, 2014 at 8:17 | comment | added | mstrkrft | Hi Paul, thank you for your answer. I already managed to derive a implicit Finite Volume solver based on the Newton method. However, I want to use a FEM approach, but I can't seem to bring this into a form, where I can use the Newton method. | |
| Dec 17, 2014 at 7:03 | history | edited | mstrkrft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 63 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 20:14 | comment | added | Paul | Hi mstrkft and welcome to scicomp! In general, if your PDE is non-linear, then you should expect your system of equations will also be non-linear and will need to consider a non-linear solver such as newton method. | |
| Dec 16, 2014 at 19:53 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 19, 2014 at 21:44 | |||||
| Dec 16, 2014 at 19:52 | history | asked | mstrkrft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |