Timeline for Computation of multipole expansion of potential not converging
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2015 at 21:58 | history | edited | shilov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 26, 2015 at 20:21 | history | edited | Doug Lipinski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 26, 2015 at 17:50 | answer | added | sebastian_g | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 26, 2015 at 10:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciComp/status/559654323723198464 | ||
| Jan 25, 2015 at 23:01 | vote | accept | shilov | ||
| Jan 25, 2015 at 23:00 | answer | added | Daniel Shapero | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 21:02 | comment | added | shilov | That seems to be it! I now have error: 3.12250225676e-15 with upper bound on error: 1.0101010101e-14, feel free to put an answer for the question. | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 20:52 | comment | added | Daniel Shapero |
This might be stupid, but you should check that Greengard's notes and the scipy sph_harm function don't swap what they mean by $\theta$ and $\phi$ for the spherical angles. From the scipy documentation: "There are different conventions for the meaning of input arguments theta and phi. We take theta to be the azimuthal angle and phi to be the polar angle. It is common to see the opposite convention - that is theta as the polar angle and phi as the azimuthal angle."
|
|
| Jan 25, 2015 at 19:01 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 26, 2015 at 8:53 | |||||
| Jan 25, 2015 at 18:58 | history | asked | shilov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |