Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 28, 2018 at 20:22 comment added Biswajit Banerjee @user27504: Engineering StackExchange will be a better fit for that question. The guess is typically based on experiments on similar materials and sometimes micromechanics. But in my experience people just pick numbers out of the hat. I believe that's because practitioners often don't know much mechanics beyond undergraduate strength of materials. Also, composite specialists tend not to trust numerics and rely more on hands-on trial and error. Though a lot of testing is done, it's typically tensile testing or three-point bend tests which are insufficient for fully characterizing anisotropy.
May 28, 2018 at 4:44 comment added nicoguaro @user27504, yes, please start a new question.
May 28, 2018 at 2:36 comment added user27504 Ah interesting, maybe I should start a new thread on this, but not sure if it would fit in the scicomp question. What would their guess be based on though? Transversely isotropic is still a lot better for full anisotropic. I wonder how people do it for full anisotropic mateirals
May 27, 2018 at 23:36 comment added Biswajit Banerjee @user27504: "how computational people obtain the full stiffness coefficient matrix ...". They guess. It's extremely difficult to experimentally measure these quantities (particularly Poisson's ratios) even for transversely isotropic materials.
May 27, 2018 at 19:33 comment added nicoguaro @user27504, I don't have a definite answer to this. But I think that question is better asked separately.
May 27, 2018 at 19:24 comment added user27504 Ah yes. Do you know how computational people obtain the full stiffness coefficient matrix for a fully anisotropic material? I'm assuming they usually get something from experiments?
May 27, 2018 at 18:34 vote accept user27504
May 27, 2018 at 17:51 history answered nicoguaro CC BY-SA 4.0