Timeline for Mass Matrix and how to handle it (ODEs) - References
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019 at 18:41 | vote | accept | VoB | ||
| Apr 3, 2019 at 8:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 3, 2019 at 22:16 | answer | added | Chris Rackauckas | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 3, 2019 at 9:52 | comment | added | VoB | With the test problem I used above, the order was right with both the expressions, but your question makes sense: there's nothing that ensures commutativity for that product | |
| Mar 2, 2019 at 20:11 | comment | added | VorKir | A quick question, don’t you need commutativity between $M(y_n)$ and $M(y_{n+1}$ in your trapezoidal rule derivation (last equation in Edit 2)? Is there a reason to assume that such commutativity holds? | |
| Mar 2, 2019 at 15:19 | history | edited | VoB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| Mar 2, 2019 at 12:39 | history | edited | VoB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added another idea
|
| Feb 28, 2019 at 17:23 | comment | added | VoB | Edited my post, adding a possible way to handle Newton's method | |
| Feb 28, 2019 at 17:23 | history | edited | VoB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added another idea
|
| Feb 28, 2019 at 16:53 | comment | added | VoB | @BillGreene you're right! Honestly, I read it some time ago, and probably too much quickly! At page 8 there's an approach which is quite familiar with mine | |
| Feb 28, 2019 at 16:47 | comment | added | Bill Greene | On the contrary, the matlab ode solvers including ode15s are well documented (IMHO). I suggest starting with this reference: mathworks.com/help/pdf_doc/otherdocs/ode_suite.pdf | |
| Feb 28, 2019 at 16:35 | history | asked | VoB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |