Timeline for What is the maximum attainable accuracy with a given set of $\alpha,\beta$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2020 at 16:36 | vote | accept | econmajorr | ||
| Mar 25, 2020 at 4:03 | answer | added | Mithridates the Great | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 20:12 | comment | added | Mithridates the Great | Try to expand $u(x_i+mh)$ terms around $x_i$ due to the fact that $h$ is small. Then try to find $u^{“}$ and eliminate unwanted terms. | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 20:10 | comment | added | econmajorr | @Alone Programmer can you say a little more on that? | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 19:44 | comment | added | Mithridates the Great | So the accuracy in terms of $\mathcal{O}(h^{n})$ could be find easily by Taylor expansion. | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 19:12 | comment | added | econmajorr | I am not trying to solve a PDE but to differentiate a function twice. | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 19:06 | comment | added | Mithridates the Great | The general attainable accuracy depends on lots of things and FDM stencil is just one of them. You need to express what is your application and possibly the PDE that you are trying to solve here. | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 19:00 | history | asked | econmajorr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |