Timeline for How to solve a BVP with known parameters?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2021 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciComp/status/1471495365983571968 | ||
| S Dec 15, 2021 at 13:00 | history | suggested | Miscellaneous | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix typo and remove tag
|
| Dec 15, 2021 at 10:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 15, 2021 at 13:00 | |||||
| S Dec 12, 2021 at 19:43 | history | suggested | Tyberius | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Code formatting
|
| Dec 12, 2021 at 17:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 12, 2021 at 19:43 | |||||
| Dec 12, 2021 at 16:25 | comment | added | Tyberius | Sorry, I had glossed over that in the docs. I think I may have found an alternative solution that I added as an answer. | |
| Dec 12, 2021 at 16:24 | answer | added | Tyberius | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 12, 2021 at 11:30 | comment | added | Ken Grimes | Thanks @Tyberius for your comment but the documentation says "p is a k-D vector of unknown parameters ". In my case, the parameters are known | |
| Dec 12, 2021 at 1:12 | comment | added | Tyberius |
The documentation says you can write a function of the form f(x,y,p) where p will be an array of additional parameters. So you could just pass k in as an element of p.
|
|
| Dec 11, 2021 at 17:13 | history | asked | Ken Grimes | CC BY-SA 4.0 |