Timeline for Software package for constrained optimization?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 12, 2012 at 1:52 | history | edited | Geoff Oxberry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added material from comment by Barron.
|
Jan 7, 2012 at 1:25 | comment | added | J. M. | @Barron: you should have put that in your answer to begin with. :) | |
Jan 6, 2012 at 14:52 | comment | added | Barron | To be clear, I have no reason to say that OPT++ is superior to any of those that you listed previously because I don't have any experience with those (though I bookmarked a few of them to check out). But I do have experience with OPT++ and have found it suitable for my needs. It supports linear and nonlinear constraints with an efficient nonlinear interior point solver, provides control for function accuracy (if numerical differentiation is required), control for step sizes, etc. I'm typically optimizing large implicit functions (e.g. FEM) where these types of controls can be useful. | |
Jan 6, 2012 at 7:02 | comment | added | Geoff Oxberry | Could you elaborate on why OPT++ is a good package to use? Do you (or your colleagues) have any experience with it? | |
Jan 4, 2012 at 18:48 | history | answered | Barron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |