Timeline for What's the state-of-the-art in highly oscillatory integral computation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2013 at 7:37 | history | edited | Jan |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 17, 2013 at 7:04 | comment | added | J. M. | Well, it is indeed true that there's no "magic bullet" yet in the computation of highly oscillatory integrals, but we make do with what we have, and we're always thankful if they work. | |
| Jun 17, 2013 at 5:01 | comment | added | Geoff Oxberry | @Gigi: Welcome to SciComp! Your comment is a little vague; could you elaborate on why you think the state of the art in approximation of highly oscillatory integrals is bad? | |
| Jun 17, 2013 at 4:58 | comment | added | user4570 | Its bad.. no general method so far.. Just many attempts but expect them to fail now and then... Some articles claim they have the jackpot, but when it sounds too good to be true... it is. | |
| Jan 6, 2012 at 16:47 | vote | accept | Quadrescence | ||
| Jan 2, 2012 at 5:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciComp/status/153708865383448577 | ||
| Dec 22, 2011 at 21:06 | answer | added | GertVdE | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 21, 2011 at 22:20 | answer | added | Andrew Moylan | timeline score: 12 | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 4:57 | history | edited | J. M. |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 30, 2011 at 9:39 | answer | added | J. M. | timeline score: 21 | |
| Nov 30, 2011 at 9:02 | history | edited | J. M. |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 30, 2011 at 8:51 | history | asked | Quadrescence | CC BY-SA 3.0 |