Timeline for How do I get reliable timing data for time spent in function calls in my code?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scicomp.stackexchange.com/ with https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 17, 2016 at 15:14 | comment | added | Mike Dunlavey | Hi Geoff. You can get fairly accurate time fraction if you can get a large number of stack samples, as you might with oprofile. The fraction of samples $f$ where your function appears gives its inclusive fraction. If you get $n$ samples, the standard error is $\sqrt{nf(1-f)}$. So for a 1% standard error, you need around 10^4 to 10^5 samples. | |
| Apr 21, 2013 at 10:56 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciComp/status/325925904595439616 | ||
| Apr 15, 2013 at 17:03 | history | edited | David Ketcheson |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 15, 2013 at 9:50 | answer | added | Pedro | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 2:44 | answer | added | Wolfgang Bangerth | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 0:22 | answer | added | Bill Barth | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 14, 2013 at 23:49 | history | asked | Geoff Oxberry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |