Timeline for Data structures for finite volume code: Arrays vs Classes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2013 at 21:36 | vote | accept | 0b1100001 | ||
| Jun 25, 2013 at 21:36 | |||||
| Jun 25, 2013 at 0:24 | comment | added | boyfarrell | In the post I wanted to warn about the potential pit falls of "premature objectification" of numerical code, particularly when one is starting out. I'm not adverse to using objects, see my third point: if objects can reduce complexity then they are a good idea. I agree that the examples you cite are good uses, but getting to that point requires experience. | |
| Jun 24, 2013 at 16:08 | comment | added | Ethan Coon | I disagree strongly with the statement that OO is not a good fit for numerical programming, but where it is a good fit is at a much higher level. OO is very useful for things like physics models, meshes, solvers, etc, but is almost always inappropriate at the level of cells. | |
| Jun 24, 2013 at 11:16 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jun 24, 2013 at 11:05 | history | edited | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More info. about numpy
|
| Jun 24, 2013 at 10:59 | history | answered | boyfarrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |