Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with explicit-methods
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 549
For questions about explicit differential equation algorithms, that directly relate the next time step of some variable y to some function of y at the current time step.
6
votes
2
answers
449
views
How can I reduce the communication bottleneck of a parallel explicit finite difference scheme?
Suppose i was trying to solve a parabolic PDE (heat equation) on a rectangular domain using an explicit finite difference scheme. I am storing my solution vector in a matrix form (because it closely …
- 12.2k