Timeline for A simple PDE solution question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 11, 2016 at 9:57 | comment | added | ASK22 | I have posted a new question here which is a follow up question but didnt have any luck until now.. Should I try asking tha same thing but in a different way? | |
S Feb 3, 2016 at 19:11 | history | suggested | Vikramaditya Gaonkar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
small spelling errors
|
Feb 3, 2016 at 18:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 3, 2016 at 19:11 | |||||
Feb 3, 2016 at 15:29 | history | edited | ASK22 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3169 characters in body
|
Feb 3, 2016 at 15:27 | comment | added | ASK22 | Ok. Thank you for your interest. I will delete the update from here and make a new one hoping for an answer. | |
Feb 3, 2016 at 15:25 | comment | added | Wolfgang Bangerth | A whole new question. Updating old questions is confusing because the answers no longer seem to fit the question. | |
Feb 3, 2016 at 15:21 | comment | added | ASK22 | @WolfgangBangerth. You mean like a whole new question? or like an answer to this question? | |
Feb 3, 2016 at 15:20 | comment | added | Wolfgang Bangerth | I think you should put your follow-up questions into a question of itself. | |
Jan 29, 2016 at 9:31 | history | edited | ASK22 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3244 characters in body
|
Jan 28, 2016 at 17:31 | answer | added | Wolfgang Bangerth | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 27, 2016 at 10:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciComp/status/692288345020502016 | ||
Jan 26, 2016 at 21:30 | comment | added | ASK22 | Also, please refer to this link for a more detail explanation of my problem. | |
Jan 26, 2016 at 21:13 | comment | added | ASK22 | Paul, thank you for your reply. I have read about the difference of conservative and non conservative form see link. The think is that if I treat the quantity ρ*u like one variable then in the case of dynamic balance I would have another one (ρ). Is n't that correct? I would need more equations than the ones that i have now. Maybe one to correlate ρ & u? | |
Jan 26, 2016 at 18:50 | comment | added | Paul | In general, it's better to apply the finite difference scheme without using the product rule. You will find that the resulting method is more stable and preserves continuity. | |
Jan 26, 2016 at 16:10 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 26, 2016 at 20:14 | |||||
Jan 26, 2016 at 16:05 | history | asked | ASK22 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |